ACAP Latest News

Read about recent developments and findings in procellariiform science and conservation relevant to the Agreement on the Conservation of Albatrosses and Petrels in ACAP Latest News.

Black Petrel monitoring on New Zealand’s Great Barrier Island/Aotea over 2021/22

 

 Biz Surface bird on Aotea Credit Biz Bell WMIL
A Black Petrel in the breeding colony on Great Barrier Island, photograph by 'Biz' Bell,Wildlife Management International

The Conservation Services Programme (CSP) of New Zealand’s Department of Conservation works to reduce the impact of commercial fishing on protected species in New Zealand fisheries waters.  Here are summaries of two of its most recent final reports by Wildlife Management International on the ACAP-listed and globally Vulnerable Black Petrel Procellaria parkinsoni by the ecological consultancy Wildlife Management International.

Land component

This report is part of the ongoing study of the tākoketai/black petrel, Procellaria parkinsoni, on Great Barrier Island/Aotea that began in the 1995/1996 breeding season.

During the 2021/2022 breeding season 478 tākoketai/black petrel study burrows were intensively monitored within the Mt Hobson/Hirakimata study area on Aotea/Great Barrier Island.

There were 326 (68.2%) burrows occupied by breeding pairs, 92 (19.2%) occupied by non-breeding birds, and 60 (12.6%) were unoccupied. Overall, 239 chicks were produced from the study burrows representing a fledgling success rate of 73.3%.

Nine census grids were monitored within the study area and accounted for 196 of the inspected study burrows. Of these, 148 were occupied by breeding pairs (75.5%) and 102 chicks were produced representing a fledging success rate of 68.9%. A total of 745 adults and 254 fledgling chicks were captured during the 2021/2022 field season with 107 adults banded this season (including 69 from study burrows). Of the 254 fledgling chicks banded during the 2021/2022 field season, 227 were banded in study burrows; 12 had already fledged prior to the banding visit in May 2022.

There have been a total of 386 returned chicks recaptured at the colony since they were banded prior to fledging. Of these, 124 returned chicks identified during the 2021/2022 breeding season; 23 of which had been caught for the first time at the colony. The majority of returned chicks were from the 2013/2014 breeding season, followed by the 2010/2011 cohort). Not all cohorts were represented as no returned chicks from the 1995/1996 and 1996/1997 cohorts were recaptured this season.

Understanding the factors affecting return rates of chicks within the 35-ha study site is vital. It is important to determine whether it is related to low juvenile survival and/or recruitment or if it is simply due to a lack of detection. Understanding juvenile survival and recruitment is necessary for accurate population estimates and risk assessment modelling. Therefore, it is recommended that effort to obtain this data is completed with urgency.

Preliminary monitoring of pig and other predator occurrence and impact on black petrels on Cooper’s Castle was undertaken this season. Sixteen black petrel burrows were identified within the boundaries of this study area; three were breeding and one was being visited by non-breeding birds. All other burrows were empty. Trail cameras were placed along pig pathways, walking tracks and outside active black petrel burrows. Footage confirmed feral pig, rat, and feral cat presence. While no interactions with black petrels were caught on camera, there was one cat predation and one rat predation at the study colony this season. Introduced species still pose a threat to the black petrel population and it is imperative pest control measures continue.

At-sea captures

n January 2022 WMIL staff were only able to undertake a one-day catching trip out in the waters north-east of the Marotere (Chicken) Islands group, and north of the Mokohinau Islands group. Poor weather prevented a longer trip. A total of 17 black petrels were caught from the back of the boat using a hand cast net and were all un-banded birds. Additional species caught were 18 toanui/flesh[1]footed shearwater (Ardenna carneipes) (Threat Status - At Risk: Relict).

In March 2022 WMIL staff were able to undertake a longer three-day catching trip, targeting the same areas, but particularly north of the Mokohinau Islands group. A total of 130 black petrels were caught from the back of a boat using the same hand cast net method. This total included 5 already banded birds from WMIL study colonies on Aotea/Great Barrier Island and Te Hauturu-o-Toi/Little Barrier Island, as well as 3 banded birds from the at-sea capture work. Additional species caught and banded were 78 flesh-footed shearwater, two New Zealand storm petrel (Fregetta maoriana) (Threat Classification: Nationally Vulnerable) and one rako/Buller’s shearwater (Ardenna bulleri) (Threat Classification: At Risk: Declining).

In November 2022 WMIL staff were able to undertake a two-day catching trip, targeting the same areas as previously. A total of 39 black petrels were caught using the hand cast net method. This total included 2 already banded birds from the WMIL study colony on Aotea/Great Barrier Island. Additionally, 30 flesh-footed shearwaters were also caught and banded, one of which was already banded, having been banded at a WMIL study colony on Lady Alice Island in 2017. Finally one ōi/grey[1]faced petrel (Pterodroma gouldi) (Threat Classification: Not Threatened) was also caught and banded.

Over all trips undertaken by WMIL (April 2021, January 2022, March 2022 and November 2022), a total of 383 seabirds were captured altogether (April 2021: n=67, January 2022: n=35, March 2022: n=211, November 2022: n=70). A total of 176 (January 2022: n=17, March 2022: n=122, November 2022: n=37) black petrels were newly banded over all 2022 trips. Including the April 2021 preliminary trial captures, a total of 241 black petrels have been caught over the cumulative 9 days (April 2021: n=55 over 3 days, January 2022: n=17 on 1 day, March 2022: n=130 over 3 days, November 2022: n=39 over 2 days). Of these, 8 were previously banded at a terrestrial colony, representing 3% of total captures. The average daily capture rate of tākoketai/black petrel for each trip is highly variable; 18 per day in April 2021, 17 per day in January 2022, 43 per day in March 2022, and 20 per day in November 2022, with the average daily capture rate of black petrels for all trips being 27. The highest average catches were in the first and last light periods of the day (7-9am and 5-7pm).

Key recommendations for future work are:

  • Trips need to be undertaken towards the start of the breeding season, i.e., mid-November through to early February, with several trips throughout the breeding season to allow WMIL staff to capture more birds.
  • A large amount of bait should be taken to facilitate creating more feeding frenzies and theoretically more birds behind the back of the boat for capture.
  • Future work should be clarified much further in advance to increase the success of this work particularly dealing with ever changing weather and swell conditions, COVID disruptions, moon phases, and aligning the WMIL team and the skipper’s schedules.
  • Undertake future work around the dimmest phases of the moon.
  • Undertake work further north with either the same skipper (El Pescador Charters) or another suitable vessel (i.e., with a duckboard), to target other areas of this species range.
  • Future work should budget for a team of three (minimum) to have flexible flying and accommodation costs, as well as the rising costs of diesel fuel for boat charters and covering the cost of higher bait use.

References:

Bell, E.A., Welch, M. & Lamb, S. 2022.  Key demographic parameters and population trends of tākoketai/black petrels (Procellaria parkinsoni) on Aotea/Great Barrier Island: 2021/2022.  POP2021-01 final report prepared by Wildlife Management International for the Department of Conservation, Wellington.  35 pp.

Burgin, D. 2022.  Summary report for at-sea capture work for tākoketai/black petrels 2022.  POP2021-01 final report prepared by Wildlife Management International for the Department of Conservation, Wellington.  18 pp.

Both reports are available from here.

John Cooper, ACAP News Correspondent, 28 December 2022

Using at-sea tracking data to infer distributions of three Calonectris Shearwaters

OLYMPUS DIGITAL CAMERA
Scopoli’s Shearwater, photograph by Georgios Karris

Virginia Morera-Pujol (Departament de Biologia Evolutiva, Ecologia i Ciències Ambientals, Universitat de Barcelona, Spain) and colleagues have published in the open-access journal Diversity and Distributions on challenges using individual tracking data to infer higher-level distributions.  The authors used a data set of 1346 year-round migratory trips from 805 individuals of Cory’s Calonectris borealis, Cape Verde C. edwardsii and Scopoli’s C. diomedea Shearwaters breeding in 34 colonies in the Mediterranean Sea and the Atlantic Ocean, spanning 10 years, to address the issue.

The paper’s abstract follows:

"Aim

Over the last decades, the study of movement through tracking data has grown exceeding the expectations of movement ecologists. This has posed new challenges, specifically when using individual tracking data to infer higher-level distributions (e.g. population and species). Sources of variability such as individual site fidelity (ISF), environmental stochasticity over time, and space-use variability across species ranges must be considered, and their effects identified and corrected, to produce accurate estimates of spatial distribution using tracking data.

Innovation

We developed R functions to detect the effect of these sources of variability in the distribution of animal groups when inferred from individual tracking data. These procedures demonstrated our procedures with simulated datasets and showed their applicability on a real-world dataset containing 1346 year-round migratory trips from 805 individuals of three closely related seabird species breeding in 34 colonies in the Mediterranean Sea and the Atlantic Ocean, spanning 10 years. We detected an effect of ISF in one of the colonies, but no effect of the environmental stochasticity on the distribution of birds for any of the species. We also identified among-colony variability in nonbreeding space use for one species, with significant effects of population size and longitude.

Main conclusions

This work provides a useful, much-needed tool for researchers using animal tracking data to model species distributions or establish conservation measures. This methodology may be applied in studies using individual tracking data to accurately infer the distribution of a population or species and support the delineation of important areas for conservation based on tracking data. This step, designed to precede any analysis, has become increasingly relevant with the proliferation of studies using large tracking datasets that has accompanied the globalization process in science driving collaborations and tracking data sharing initiatives.”

With thanks to Georgios Karris.

Reference:

Morera-Pujol, V., Catry, P., Magalhãe, M., Péron, C., Reyes-González, J.M., Granadeiro, J.P., Militão, T., Dias, M.P., Oro, F., Dell'Omo, G., Müller, M., Paiva, V.H., Metzger, B., Neves, V., Navarro, J., Karris, G., Xirouchakis, S., Cecere, J.G., Zamora-López, A., Forero, M.G., Ouni, R., Romdhane, M.S., De Felipe, F., Zajková, Z., Cruz-Flores, M., Grémillet, D., González-Solís, J. & Ramos, R. 2022.  Methods to detect spatial biases in tracking studies caused by differential representativeness of individuals, populations and time.  Diversity and Distribution. doi.org/10.1111/ddi.13642.

John Cooper, ACAP News Correspondent, 27 December 2022

Flesh-footed shearwater population monitoring on three New Zealand islands, 2021/22

Flesh footed Shearwater 2 Kirk Zufelt
A Flesh-footed Shearwater rests at sea, photograph by Kirk Zufelt

The Conservation Services Programme (CSP) of New Zealand’s Department of Conservation works to reduce the impact of commercial fishing on protected species in New Zealand fisheries waters.  Here are summaries of two of its most recent final reports by ecological consultancy Wildlife Management International on the globally Near Threatened Flesh-footed Shearwater Ardenna carneipes, a species that has been identified for listing by ACAP (click here).

Lady Alice and Ohinau Island

This report covers the findings from the first year of flesh-footed shearwater (Ardenna carneipes) research under Conservation Services Programme project POP2021-04. Here we report on the ongoing population monitoring of flesh-footed shearwaters on Ohinau and Lady Alice Islands. An updated population estimate for Titi Island, Marlborough Sounds is presented in a separate report.

During the 2021/22 season we monitored 261 and 302 study burrows on Ohinau and Lady Alice Islands respectively. The breeding success (burrows with an egg that produce a chick that is likely to survive to fledging) on Ohinau Island was 59%, similar to the 58% measured in the 2020/21 season. Breeding success on Lady Alice Island was 51%, which was also similar to the 48% measured in 2020/21 season. There were no detectable differences in breeding success between study and burrowscope (control) burrows, indicating no impact of handler disturbance. We were able to identify 73% of the birds in breeding study burrows on Ohinau Island and 93% in burrows on Lady Alice Island. An additional 349 and 165 flesh-footed shearwaters were banded on Ohinau and Lady Alice Island respectively. 

Titi Island

This report covers the findings from the first year of toanui/flesh-footed shearwater (Ardenna carneipes) (Threat Status - At Risk: Relict) research under the Department of Conservation’s Conservation Services Programme, project ‘DOC CSP POP2021-04’. Here we report on the flesh-footed shearwater population estimate undertaken on Titi Island, Marlborough, to update previous estimates made in 2010 and 2014 (Baker et al. 2010 and Waugh et al. 2014).

Burrow transects were carried out on Titi Island to gather data for an updated population estimate for flesh-footed shearwaters known to breed on the island. It is estimated that there are a total of 528 (250 – 806, 95% CI) occupied flesh-footed shearwater burrows on Titi Island with an average burrow occupancy of 15% calculated across all colony areas. Through this transect work, it was also possible to calculate a population estimate for the tītī/sooty shearwaters (Ardenna grisea) (Threat Status - At Risk: Declining) breeding on the island. It is estimated that there are a total of 1,038 (544 - 1,533, 95% CI) occupied sooty shearwater burrows on Titi Island with an average burrow occupancy of 25%, calculated as an average across all colony areas.

The flesh-footed shearwater population estimate presented here for Titi Island is slightly higher than the previous estimate carried out by Baker et al. (2010) and Waugh et al. (2014). We conclude that our estimates are not necessarily reflective of a population increase, but more likely a result of more in-depth and higher-quality sampling and analysis techniques giving a more accurate estimate of population sizes compared to the two previous estimates. We recommend another future population estimate be undertaken in 5 years, utilising the same methods to support long term population trend analyses on Titi Island.

References:

Burgin, D., and Ray, S. 2022.  Flesh-footed shearwater population monitoring and estimates: 2021/22 season.  POP2021-04 final report prepared by Wildlife Management International Limited for the Department of Conservation, Wellington.  24 pp.

Burgin, D. & Lamb, S. 2022.  Toanui/flesh-footed shearwater (Ardenna carneipes) population estimate for Titi Island, Marlborough Sounds: January 2022.  POP2021-04 final report prepared by Wildlife Management International Limited for Department of Conservation, Wellington.  23 pp.

Both reports are available from here.

John Cooper, ACAP News Correspondent, 26 December 2022

Season’s Greetings from the ACAP Secretariat and best wishes for 2023

ACAP Seasons Greetings web 3Photographs from left to right: A Balearic Shearwater by Pep Arcos; a Grey Petrel chick by Jeremy Bird; a Black-browed Albatross and chick by Ian Strange

 The ACAP Secretariat extends season’s greetings and its best wishes for 2023 to all. 

In 2023 ACAP will continue to engage in efforts for the the conservation of the magnificent albatrosses, petrels and shearwaters listed under the Agreement.

Preparations are already well underway to mark World Albatross Day on 19 June and we look forward to celebrating once again with the wonderful and dedicated albatross-admiring community across the globe. ACAP has chosen the theme "Plastic Pollution" for next year’s celebrations, highlighting this urgent and growing global problem. A range of posters and infographics will be available to download from the website in time for the event.

The United Kingdom is set to host the thirteenth Meeting of ACAP’s Advisory Committee (AC13) in the Scottish capital of Edinburgh in May. Meetings of the Seabird Bycatch Working Group (SBWG) and the Population and Conservation Status Working Group (PaCSWG) will precede AC13. 

For all your ACAP news and stories of interest, find us on Facebook and Instagram as well as here on ACAP Latest News.

The ACAP Secretariat, 23 December 2022

The New Zealand Journal of Ecology reviews the restoration of New Zealand’s sub-Antarctic islands

Picture4
The Million Dollar Mouse project works towards its ultimate success as a bait bucket is loaded at last light on Antipodes Island; photograph by Keith Springer

Note:  In this guest article, Keith Springer, Operations Manager for South Africa’s Mouse-Free Marion Project, writes about a suite of publications in a special issue of the New Zealand Journal of Ecology on the restoration of New Zealand’s sub-Antarctic islands.  A Table of Contents with linked titles and lead authors follows his article.

******************************

For many years now, New Zealand has put significant effort and resources into managing pest animal species on its sub-Antarctic islands.  There are five main groups, Antipodes Island, Auckland Islands, Bounty Islands, Campbell Island and The Snares, that together form the New Zealand Sub-Antarctic Islands World Heritage Site.  The Bounty Islands and The Snares have never had introduced mammals establish on them — they have remained animal pest-free.

Auckland Island pig Pete McClelland
A rare breed in the cross hairs?  A
feral pig forages among washed-up kelp along the shore on Auckland Island; photograph by Pete McClelland

The other three island groups all had numerous species of introduced mammal established.  This occurred for several reasons.  Some animals established either from shipwrecks or from stowaways in the stores and equipment brought by the first European visitors – the sealers and whalers of the early 19th Century.  This typically included rats, mice, cats, and sometimes, dogs.  Because the islands lay on the ‘Great Circle’ shipping route – in the days of sail, ships bound from Australia to England sailed these latitudes to pick up the prevailing westerly winds – shipwrecks were common (the location of Auckland Islands being incorrectly marked on the charts didn’t help).  As a result, animals like goats, pigs and rabbits were introduced so that shipwrecked sailors might find sustenance.  Finally, the government let grazing leases on some islands, so cattle and sheep were taken there as part of farming operations.

Over the years, the sealing and whaling industries collapsed, steam ships replaced sail, so the Great Circle Route fell into disuse and the grazing leases were cancelled.  However, the animals remained, and diminished the biodiversity values of the islands by eating seabirds, land birds, invertebrates and by grazing the vegetation.  The sum of these impacts was a significant deterioration of the ecological condition of those islands with introduced pests.

 Picture5
A globally
Endangered Antipodean Albatross Diomedea antipodensis feeds its chick on Antipodes Island; photograph by Keith Springer

From the 1980s, the then-New Zealand Wildlife Service set about trying to address these impacts, although a paper in the Proceedings of the New Zealand Ecological Society of 1968 had discussed this strategy earlier.  The ungulates were the easiest to remove, with sheep, cattle and goats eradicated by shooting campaigns.  With the establishment of the Department of Conservation in 1987 this work continued, with European Rabbits and House Mice removed from two smaller islands in the Auckland group.  Small by our standards now, that is, but ground-breaking efforts at that time.  This momentum saw Campbell Island cleared of Norway Rats in 2001, which has been the inspiration for many pest eradications on islands in the Southern Ocean ever since, notably on Macquarie and South Georgia (Islas Georgias del Sur)*.  House Mice were removed from Antipodes Island in 2016, and planning has been underway for some time to consider removal of mice, pigs and cats from 45 891-ha Auckland Island.  If accomplished, this would remove the last invasive mammal species from all the island groups in the World Heritage Site.

An immense body of knowledge and experience has been built up in the roughly 35 years of eradication activity on these islands, and each has informed and refined methodology for the next – not only in the New Zealand region, but on islands throughout the Southern Ocean.

                                A luxuriant carpet of the megaherb Great Emperor Daisy Pleurophyllum speciosum on Campbell Island – these verdant flower-fields have recovered now that they are free from grazing by the eradicated sheep; photograph by Keith Springer

Now, a special edition of the New Zealand Journal of Ecology collates information in 19 open-access papers on topics relating to many of these eradications on the New Zealand sub-Antarctic islands (the Campbell rat and Antipodes mouse eradications have been published elsewhere).  The edition also reports on other island eradications in New Zealand that were partly conducted as trial projects to inform the planned mouse eradication on Auckland Island, or that informed other aspects of the multi-species eradication planned for Auckland Island, such as potential methods for cat eradication on Stewart Island.  There is also a paper describing the introduced mammals that were brought back to New Zealand so that populations of these genetically isolated breeds could be maintained.  After all, most of the ungulates and lagomorphs on these islands had descended from genetic bloodlines that existed up to 200 years ago and have been isolated from others of their species ever since.

Of particular interest is the number of papers regarding the eradication of mice, including several where different bait application rates were trialled.  As noted, mouse eradication was achieved on Antipodes Island and may be attempted on Auckland Island, following some years of research and planning.  The planned eradication on Marion Island by the Mouse-Free Marion Project is certainly ambitious but undertaking this on Auckland Island – 50% larger than Marion – would be an even greater challenge, especially given the complexities caused by the presence of cats, pigs and large areas of scrub and forest.

A special-topic journal issue such as this one really does crystalise just how much has been achieved in the eradication of mammalian pests from sub-Antarctic islands.  Of even greater importance, it also describes the ends to which eradication is the means; that is - the ecological recovery that results from these management interventions.

Keith Springer, Operations Manager, Mouse-Free Marion Project, 22 December 2022

New Zealand Journal of Ecology, Volume 46(3), 2022

Table of Contents

Editorial: Restoration of New Zealand subantarctic islands by James Russell et al.

The eradication of Campbell Island sheep and subsequent ecological response by Derek Brown et al.

The hunting-assisted demise of Campbell Island cattle by Derek Brown et al.

The eradication of cattle from Enderby Island and subsequent ecological response by Derek Brown et al.

The eradication of feral goats from Auckland Island by Derek Brown et al.

Introduction, rescue, and subsequent history of Auckland Islands livestock by Michael Trotter et al.

Eradication confirmation of mice from Antipodes Island and subsequent terrestrial bird recovery by Stephen Horn et al.

Analysis of spatiotemporal patterns of home range use and habitat selection to inform management of feral pigs on Auckland Island by Dean Anderson et al.

A local eradication pilot study of methods for feral pig eradication on Auckland Island by Finlay Cox et al.

Use of automatic feeders to attract feral pigs on Auckland Island by Finlay Cox & Norm Macdonald

A field test of the anaesthetics, surgical methods and radio-transmitters required for producing Judas pigs for an eradication programme by Kate McInnes et al.

Spatial ecology meets eradication of feral cats on Auckland Island by Mariano Rodriguez-Recio et al.

Monitoring and detection of feral cats on Auckland Island by Alistair Glen et al.

Field palatability and degradation of a selection of feral cat bait matrices on Auckland Island by Finlay Cox et al.

Feral cats on Rakiura Stewart Island: population attributes and potential eradication tools by Alistair Glen et al.

Population trends of house mice during tussock mast seeding on Auckland Island by Rachael Sagar et al.

How low can you sow?  House mouse eradication on Motuareronui/Adele Island by James Livingstone et al.

A trial on Te Pākeka/Maud Island for reducing aerial baiting sow-rates for the eradication of house mice by Emmanuel Oyston et al

The next frontier: assessing the feasibility of eradicating mammalian pests from Auckland Island by Stephen Horn et al.

*A dispute exists between the Governments of Argentina and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland concerning sovereignty over the Falkland Islands (Islas Malvinas), South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands (Islas Georgias del Sur y Islas Sandwich del Sur) and the surrounding maritime areas.

The Agreement on the
Conservation of Albatrosses and Petrels

ACAP is a multilateral agreement which seeks to conserve listed albatrosses, petrels and shearwaters by coordinating international activity to mitigate known threats to their populations.

About ACAP

ACAP Secretariat

119 Macquarie St
Hobart TAS 7000
Australia

Email: secretariat@acap.aq
Tel: +61 3 6165 6674