ACAP Latest News

Read about recent developments and findings in procellariiform science and conservation relevant to the Agreement on the Conservation of Albatrosses and Petrels in ACAP Latest News.

A minor mystery: when was it first realized that South Africa's Prince Edward Island was mouse free?


Albatross Valley PEI Unbothered by mice, Wandering Albatrosses breed in close proximity in Prince Edward Island's Albatross Valley, photograph by Briuce Dyer

Unlike Marion Island, its larger neighbour 22 km away, South Africa’s sub-Antarctic Prince Edward Island is free of introduced House Mice (and any other alien mammal).  Anyone (and that includes myself) who has camped there will remember the pleasure of nights undisturbed by the scampering of mice trying to gain access to the tent – and finding no droppings inside the left-out cooking pot the next morning!  The island is free of the obvious mouse runways through the vegetation that are a frequent sight on Marion.

The relative abundance (and larger size) of invertebrates, including the tiny spiders that come out to crawl over your legs when seated on a windless day, is a revelation in comparison to its neighbour, which is plagued by the insectivorous mice.  The numbers of Lesser Sheathbills Chionis minor that forage for invertebrates among inland mire vegetation and the presence of uneaten grass heads on Prince Edward are also indications of the lack of the mice that are attacking and killing Vulnerable Wandering Albatrosses Diomedea exulans and other procellariiform seabirds on Marion Island.

1176 MM13679 LH.Lex Hes right and James Gleeson Prince Edward Island S. Indian OceanJames Gleeson (left) and Lex Hes on Prince Edward Island in 1980

But of course, these anecdotal, although repeated, observations are not completely compelling.  Clearer evidence of the absence of mice on Prince Edward Island comes from a research trip made by the late James Gleeson and Lex Hes from 30 May to 5 June 1980.  The pair, from the University of Pretoria’s Mammal Research Institute, went to the island from Marion to investigate “the presence or absence of mice in relation to insect fauna”.  Unfortunately, mention of their visit is not made in James’ MSc thesis or his published paper on Marion’s mice, nor have I come across a trip report.  However, recently I was put in contact with Lex, James’ assistant, who kindly sent photographs of their visit – and answered my questions.  Lex, from memory, and we are going back nearly half a century, remembers that they hiked around the island setting baited snap and Sherman live mouse traps (and collecting invertebrates) in different localities, including setting snap traps inside the annexation cave at Cave Bay.  He is uncertain quite where traps were set, and how many, but remembers they filled a backpack, so one imagines they had and deployed a fair number.  Return visits after baited traps were left out overnight revealed no mice.

Dead Wanderer Marion April 2023 Chris Jones 2An adult Wandering Albatross killed by House Mice on Marion Island, April 2023 - Wanderers on Prince Edward breed unbothered by mice, photograph by Chris Jones

The question now arises: when was it first realised that Prince Edward Island was known (or at least thought) to be mouse-free?  Here we need to delve into a little history.  South Africa annexed the island in January 1948, landing to raise a flag outside the annexation cave behind Cave Bay.  For at least a couple of years after that, landings were made from South African Navy frigates, as inscribed on a brass plaque mounted at the cave entrance.  But these would all have been short visits of only a few hours with no overnighting.  To my knowledge the first persons to stay overnight since the sealing era were the six scientists of the South African Biological & Geological Expedition who camped on Prince Edward from 18-22 March 1965.  Brian Huntley, the botanist, wrote in his published diary their belief that they were the first to go ashore in 15 years.  Three members revisited the island in 1966 from 28 March to 1 April.  I have recently contacted two expedition members, Brian Huntley and the ornithologist, Eduard van Zinderen Bakker Jr, to ask about their visits.  Both say they saw no mice or signs thereof on either of their two visits, but neither could recall if they believed Prince Edward to be mouse-free beforehand.

1163 MM13672 LH.James Gleeson with group of sheathbills Prince Edward Island S. Indian OceanJames Gleeson with a flock of inland-foraging Lesser Sheathbills on mouse-free Prince Edward Island in 1980, in stark contrast to mouse-infested Marion Island, photograph by Lex Hes

I have approached several of the scientists who overnighted on the island in the 1970s.  All who have replied remember noting the absence of mice.  Alan Burger, who overnighted on Prince Edward Island in 1974 and again in 1977 states “As I recall it was common knowledge that there were no mice on [Prince Edward] and we certainly saw no evidence of mice during our stay[s]”.  Presumably, the 1970s researchers learnt of the absence of mice as news filtered down from members of the 1965/66 Expedition.

Albatross Valley Peter Ryan

A quarter of the global population of thr Wandering Albatross breeds on Prince Edward. most of them in Albatross Valley, photograph by Peter Ryan

The last overnight visit to Prince Edward Island was in December 2023, when 13 scientists spent six nights ashore.  No signs of mice were seen.  Like all previous visits in the last two decades, strict biosecurity protocols were followed, so it seems near certain the island remains mouse free.

Cave Bay PE Peter Ryan
Cave Bay, Prince Edward Island, with the annexation cave and flagpole visible. No mice were found here during the 1980 trapping, photograph by Peter Ryan

A minor mystery still remains of who first established that Prince Edward Island had no mice.  A question that might never be properly answered, given the passage of time!  Nevertheless, a take-home message from all the visitors is how pristine the island is in comparison to mouse-ravaged Marion Island.  Restoring Marion to match the biodiversity of Prince Edward is the aim of the Saving Marion Island’s Seabirds: The Mouse-Free Marion (MFM) Project.  This is an aim that will be applauded by anyone who has had the privilege of visiting and staying overnight on Prince Edward Island.

With thanks to Mark Anderson, Alan Burger, Brian Huntley, Kevin Hall, Lex Hes and Eduard van Zinderen Bakker Jr.

John Cooper, Emeritus Information Officer, Agreement on the Conservation of Albatrosses and Petrels, 23 March 2026

NOTE:  The above article is an edited version of an original publication by the Mouse-Free Marion Project.

THE ACAP MONTHLY MISSIVE. The Flesh-footed Shearwater is a “highly suitable candidate” for ACAP listing, according to a proposal to be considered by the Convention on Migratory Species

COP Appendix II Flesh footed Shearwater

Australia, France and New Zealand have proposed including the Near threatened Flesh-footed Shearwater on Appendix II of the Convention on Conservation of Migratory Species of Wild Animals (CMS, also known as the Bonn Convention).  The proposal will be considered at the Fifteenth Meeting of the Conference of Parties (COP15) which will be held over 23-29 March 2026 in Campo Grande, Brazil, with the theme “Connecting Nature to Sustain Life”.

“Flesh-footed Shearwaters breed on islands around northern New Zealand, Australia and the French Southern Territories, then migrate north after breeding to the north-west Pacific and, in some cases, as far as the northern Indian Ocean.  Bycatch (especially longline fisheries) is the major threat along the species’ migratory route.  Invasive predators, plastic ingestion, climate change, vessel collisions linked to light attraction, and offshore wind farms are also pressures this species faces.” (CMS Facebook).

Appendix II covers migratory species that have an unfavourable conservation status and that require international agreements for their conservation and management, as well as those that have a conservation status which would significantly benefit from the international cooperation that could be achieved by an international agreement.

According to the proposal by the three countries (UNEP/CMS/COP15/Doc.30.2.6) “listing on Appendix II will elevate the suitability score of flesh-footed shearwater for inclusion on Annex 1 of ACAP.  A listing on Annex 1 of ACAP would further facilitate the anticipated benefits identified here as ACAP is very active in the development and promotion of best-practice seabird bycatch mitigation advice for relevant fisheries.”

In a supporting document (UNEP/CMS/COP15/Doc.31.3.10) Australia and New Zealand make a proposal for a Concerted Action for the Flesh-footed Shearwater.  The document states that “It also complements the work of the Agreement on the Conservation of Albatrosses and Petrels (ACAP), a CMS subsidiary agreement” and that the Flesh-footed Shearwater is a “highly suitable candidate for listing on Annex 1 of ACAP.”

It continues “There are no other international cooperation initiatives with a focus on flesh-footed shearwater.  The notable related mechanism in place with relevance to flesh-footed shearwater is ACAP, where ACAP Parties cooperate on matters such as development of seabird bycatch mitigation advice, and through conservation and management measures adopted by RFMOs.  However, as flesh-footed shearwaters are not listed on Annex 1 of ACAP, ACAP’s actions do not provide a high level of advocacy for flesh-footed shearwater and may fail to focus efforts on fisheries that may impact flesh-footed shearwater but not ACAP-listed species.  An additional benefit of listing flesh-footed shearwater on Appendix II of CMS is that this will elevate the suitability score of flesh-footed shearwater for inclusion on Annex 1 of ACAP.  Such a listing would further facilitate the anticipated benefits identified here.  Given CMS has more Parties with jurisdiction across the range of flesh-footed shearwater than ACAP, listing on both CMS and ACAP would maximise international cooperation to conserve flesh-footed shearwater.”

The ACAP Monthly Missive for December 2025 previously reported on the CMS proposal and considered whether the Flesh-footed Shearwater should be ACAP listed, following discussion at the 2019 Meeting of the Advisory Committee (AC11) in Brazil (click here).

ACAP Latest News will report on the outcome of the proposed listing by the Convention on Migratory Species once it becomes known.  ACAP will hold the Fifteenth Meeting of its Advisory Committee (AC15) from 1-5 June 2026 in Swakopmund, Namibia, when it will have an opportunity to consider the outcome of the proposal to list the Flesh-footed Shearwater on CMS Appendix II by three of its Parties.

It is to be noted that any opinions expressed in ACAP Monthly Missives are not to be taken as those of the ACAP Secretariat or any of the Agreement’s Parties.

John Cooper, Emeritus Information Officer, Agreement on the Conservation of Albatrosses and Petrels, 20 March 2026

ACAP releases its newly designed World Albatross Day logo for 2026

WAD2026 vertical
For the last six years, since the inauguration of World Albatross Day on 19 June 2020, logos marking the event have been produced by graphic designer Geoff Tyler.  Versions have been produced in the three ACAP official languages of English, French and Spanish; in some years Japanese, Portuguese and a few other languages have been added.

WAD2026 horizontal

This year a new design, in horizontal and vertical layouts, has been produced for WAD2026 and its theme of “Habitat Restoration” by illustrator Namasri “Namo” Niumim, who resides in Bangkok, Thailand.  Namo is not new to ACAP, as she has produced all the ACAP Species Infographics to date.

French, Portuguese and Spanish versions of the WAD2026 logo will follow soon.  They will be available for downloading from here.

John Cooper, Emeritus Information Officer, Agreement on the Conservation of Albatrosses and Petrels, 19 March 2026

Albatrosses and petrel assemblages offshore from New Zealand’s Otago Peninsula

Kitty
Northern Royal Albatross at sea for World Albatross Day 2020, artwork by Kitty Harvill after a photograph by Laurie Smaglick Johnson

Nicholas Daudt (Department of Marine Science, University of Otago, Dunedin, Aotearoa, New Zealand) and colleagues have published open access in the journal Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science on seabird assemblages off the east coast of South Island, New Zealand.  Albatrosses and petrels tended to occur offshore (>35 km).

The paper’s abstract follows:

“Understanding the relationships between organisms and their environment is crucial to determining important areas for conservation and monitoring. In rapidly changing oceans, one approach to quantify these relationships is to identify species assemblages. This study used a nine year dataset of seabird observations sampled approximately every two months during a cross-shelf transect to describe assemblages at the Subtropical Frontal Zone, in southeast Aotearoa/New Zealand. During 36 voyages, 47 species and a minimum of 69,025 individual birds were recorded. We used multivariate, model-based ordinations to identify assemblages against spatial (distance from the coast), temporal (season) and environmental (water mass) predictors. The multivariate models suggest that the distance from the coast and seasons explain most of the observed variability. Gulls and shags influenced a coastal assemblage (25 km from the coast), and most albatrosses and petrels were only recorded offshore (35 km). Seasons strongly influenced the assemblages, with 31 of the 39 analysed species classified as migratory or dispersive. Over the nine year dataset, the probability of occurrence of nearly 40% of the analysed species changed, indicating possible changes in the assemblage structure and species’ ranges. This study shows the importance of accounting for seasonality when describing assemblages in regions supporting high proportions of migratory and/or wide-ranging species. The observed changes in the probability of occurrence of several species may be the first evidence for the effects of oceanographic changes recently described for the southwest Pacific Ocean due to above-average warming caused by climate change.”

With thanks to the Pacific Seabird Group.

Reference:

Daudt, N.W., Loh, G, Currie, K.I., Schofield, M.R., Smith, R.O., Woehler, E.J., Bugoni, L. & Rayment, W.J. 2025.  Changing species occurrences at the Subtropical Frontal Zone.  Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 323, 109405. doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2025.109405.

John Cooper, Emeritus Information Officer, Agreement on the Conservation of Albatrosses and Petrels, 18 March 2026

The Northern Royal Albatrosses at Taiaroa Head/Pukekura are having a record breeding season

2025 26 Northrn Royal Albatross pairFemale Northern Royal Albatross LYL (Lime-Yellow-Lime) stands over her newly laid egg in November 2025, with male partner behind, photograph by Department of Conservation Ranger Scott

Hatching statistics are in for the intensively managed colony of globally Endangered Northern Royal Albatrosses Diomedea sanfordi at Taiaroa Head/Pukekura on New Zealand’s South Island.

Of the 47 eggs laid in the current 2025/26 breeding season, a record 40 chicks have hatched giving a hatching success of 85.1%.  One chick died when two days old, with the remaining 39 currently transcending to the post-guard stage.

Royal can chick 2026
The 2025/26 Royal Cam chick at 46 days of age spreads it’s still stubby wings

Watch the pair WYL and BOK rearing their male chick, which hatched on 22 January, throughout the breeding season via the 24-hour Royal Cam.

Information from the New Zealand Department of Conservation Facebook page.

John Cooper, Emeritus Information Officer, Agreement on the Conservation of Albatrosses and Petrels, 17 March 2026

The Agreement on the
Conservation of Albatrosses and Petrels

ACAP is a multilateral agreement which seeks to conserve listed albatrosses, petrels and shearwaters by coordinating international activity to mitigate known threats to their populations.

About ACAP

ACAP Secretariat

119 Macquarie St
Hobart TAS 7000
Australia

Email: secretariat@acap.aq
Tel: +61 3 6165 6674