Utilizing Ecological Risk Assessments to help reduce high levels of incidental mortality of seabirds by fisheries

Cleo Small (BirdLife Global Seabird Programme, Royal Society for the Protection of Birds, UK) and colleagues writing in the journal Marine Policy, have reviewed the role of Ecological Risk Assessments in reducing high levels of incidental mortality in fisheries.

The papers' abstract follows

"Many marine species are threatened by high levels of incidental mortality in fisheries.  This paper reviews the design of selected recent, detailed Ecological Risk Assessments (ERAs) of the effects of fishing on seabirds.  Several aspects of ERA methodology for seabirds are still in development, including the most appropriate ways to: predict seabird distribution and fisheries overlap; handle data gaps; compare productivity and susceptibility among species; and incorporate data on bycatch.  Nor is there consensus on rules for selecting species or populations for inclusion in assessments, the appropriate spatial and temporal resolution for the analyses, and the definition of risk.  Despite these uncertainties, the clear benefits of undertaking quantitative or semi-quantitative ERAs include the identification of particularly vulnerable species or populations and of key areas and seasons in which bycatch may be occurring, and the highlighting of data gaps and priorities for future monitoring.  ERAs are likely to be particulaly effective where explicit links are established at the outset between the outcomes or conclusions of the ERA and management responses.  A precautionary approach to bycatch mitigation can then be embedded in the broader fisheries management framework. However, this requires that the ERA process is not overly complex or is prolonged to the extent that it draws attention away from existing responsibilities and commitments to reduce bycatch per se.  When selecting the best approach, it is vital to balance desired outputs against the availability of data for the assessment, and to deal with data gaps in a precautionary manner."


Hooked White-chinned Petrel.  Photograph by Nicolas Gasco

Reference:

Small, C., Waugh, S.M. & Phillips, R.A. 2012.  The justification, design and implementation of Ecological Risk Assessments of the effects of fishing on seabirds.  Marine Policy  doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2012.05.001.

With thanks to Richard Phillips, Co-convenor, ACAP Population and Conservation Status Working Group.

John Cooper, ACAP Information Officer, 27 June 2012


The Agreement on the
Conservation of Albatrosses and Petrels

ACAP is a multilateral agreement which seeks to conserve listed albatrosses, petrels and shearwaters by coordinating international activity to mitigate known threats to their populations.

About ACAP

ACAP Secretariat

119 Macquarie St
Hobart TAS 7000
Australia

Email: secretariat@acap.aq
Tel: +61 3 6165 6674